I don't believe it is too late. I believe that this reopening of the investigation will tend to accomplish two objectives: (1) suppression of Democrat and Independent voters who really aren't Shrillary fans; and (2) energize the Trump supporters as well as nudging those who aren't Trump fans to vote for him.

Could Obama (technically Lynch) fire Comey? Hmmm...

With Weiners background and experience . I am surprised he was not appointed by The great and powerful O to watch over middle schools.

The truth will prevail. Thanks Jullian

Comey's poor judgement was revealed when he and the DOJ decided HRC was above the law.

With or without more details, this will impact the election by reviving a major issue that the Clinton campaign thought was behind them. Especially since it's coming from Obama's Justice Department, rather than Trump or Wikileaks. And it's reminding voters of the Weiner scandal, and tying Hillary's campaign to it. This can't be good for her 11 days before the election.

I did say “if”. There is no way I know of to predict this election with any real confidence. But Carl Bernstein (of Watergate fame) did say that “We don't know what this means yet except that it's a real bombshell.”
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vide...

Immature - (adjective) not fully developed.
Indeed. Wonder if we''ll live long enough to know the truth.

I agree that in some respects, this is Comey covering his backside. I really don't know if this coming out 11 days before the election helps much. The truth will come out with the results of the investigation which will probably not be before the 8th. What a mess!

I think such remarks and speculations are exceedingly immature.

There is no straw against Hillary that has been found in this new information. So your celebration of her political demise is premature.

No they did not reopen it. A different investigation unearth something on some computational device that may possibly be relevant so it was added to the collection pertaining to the case.

Comey saw fit to apprise Congress of this despite the fact there has been no time to analyze the information and despite it not be obviously relevant or pointing to any wrong doing by Clinton. That he chose to do this at this late date without any real evaluated evidence to raise more FUD around the election is in very questionable taste and he is being criticized for what seems rather poor judgment.

They are all freaks and weirdos that I wouldn't give the time of day to.

It could be the FBI is hedging their bet, the charade that is going on with Clinton about this email mess is dangerous to them because the truth will ultimately prevale.

Imagine looking at this POTUS face for the next four years. He may be doing something like that too~
http://comicallyincorrect.com/2016/10...

In the comments section of an article today someone wrote that "Hillary is getting weinered."

Nope! Me dino methinks it's about boiling point pressure from within the FBI.
Tonight O'Reilly said he's talked with a number of FBI agents active and retired and many feel betrayed and dishonored due to Comey failing to turn Shillary's case over to a grand jury. .
Comey is dealing with quote "a rebellion" unquote similar to how this country is split.
Hannity was saying near the same thing on my car radio this afternoon.
Hannity even read a very detailed letter an agent sent to Comey that did everything but scream "Shame! Shame!"
I peeked in on Megyn Kelly while watching the classic "Dracula" and heard some commentator say that Comey is trying to "cover his ass" in those exact words.

Perfect. She'll fit right in with all the other feminazis in Wholly Weird.

Weiner's weiner rears its ugly head again. (sorry) It's fitting that sexual madness could be bringing this show to its end...

When was the last time that Krugman was not thoroughly politicized?

Maybe her own star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame? Next to Trump's (now undergoing maintenance)?

Paul Krugman, leftist columnist for the "New York Times" and full-time advisor the Clinton campaign (just kidding--sort of), is calling the FBI director disgraceful, politically motivated, grotesque... and, at the same time, saying "none of us know what this is about, as yet."

The FBI director has informed Congress, officially, that there is potential new evidence, seemingly pertinent, to the investigation of Hillary Clinton's misuse of classified emails while secretary of state, a position of high trust in these matters, no?

Chapter 18 of the U.S. Code very clearly says at any misuse of classified infomation, by anyone privy it--and such misuse includes any sharing of it, or risk of sharing it, with any person not privy to such information. It is a criminal offense, plain and simple.

If the FBI has information--in this case from the computer of a husband of a top Clinton advisor--that might be incriminating should it WAIT till after the election, so as not to influence its result? And that ISN'T influencing its result? Should the FBI director not make known that he is reopening the Clinton investigation because of new information--a celebrated case followed step by step by the public? No make it known to protect Clinton?

Krug almost immediately had a nervous breakdown because he has staked his entire reputation on in effect campaigning non-stop, in the pages of the "Times," for Clinton and against Trump. If his gal turns out to come under criminal indictment, and Trump wins, he has thoroughly politicized himself for nothing.

Much ado about nothing

busy work to make it look like the government has any interest in justice.

Again I prove that I am one of the more cynical Gulchians (Gulchites?, Gulchers? ;^)

C'mon give credit where credit is due. The award should go to the porn actress that unveiled the Weiner and up for investigation.

This is the headline story on the websites of both CNN and MSNBC. Either it's too big to bury or something interesting is going on behind the scenes.